|
|
|
Murabaha
| Q.
What is Murabaha? |
|
1.
Murabaha: (Cost-Plus Financing)
Sale
on profit. Technically a contract of sale in which the
seller declares his cost and profit. This has been adopted
as a mode of financing by a number of Islamic banks.
As a financing technique, it involves a request by the client
to the bank to purchase a certain item for him. The
bank does that for a definite profit over the cost which is
settled in advance. Some people have questioned the
legality of this financing technique because of its similarity
to riba or interest.
2.
Murabaha:
A
contract of sale between the bank and its client for the sale
of goods at a price plus an agreed profit margin for the bank.
The contract involves the purchase of goods by the bank which
then sells them to the client at an agreed mark-up. Repayment
is usually in instalments.
3.
Murabaha:
Used
if you wish to purchase equipment or goods. We will purchase
these items, and then sell them to you at cost - plus a reasonable
profit.
4.
Murabaha:
Murabaha
is the most popular and most common mode of Islamic inancing.
It is also known as Mark up or Cost plus financing. The word
Murabaha is derived from the Arabic word Ribh that means profit.
Originally, Murabaha was a contract of sale in which a ommodity
is sold on profit. The seller is obliged to tell the buyer
his ost price and the profit he is making. This contract has
been modified a little for application in the financial sectoIn
its modern form Murabaha has become the single most popular
technique of financing amongst the Islamic banks all over
the world. It has been estimated that 80 to 90 percent of
financial operations of some Islamic banks belong to this
category. The Murabaha mode of finance operates in the following
way: The client approaches an Islamic bank to get finance
in order to purchase a specific commodity. An interest-based
bank would lend the money on interest to this customer. The
customer would go and buy the required commodity from the
market. This option is not available to the Islamic bank,
as it does not operate on the basis of interest. It can not
lend the money on interest. It can not lend money with zero
interest rate, as it has to make some money to stay in the
business.
Some
portion of total finance may be offered as an interest free
loan, however, the banking institutions have to make profit
in order to stay in business. Hence, what course of action
is open to the bank? The Murabaha model offers a solution.
The bank purchases the commodity on cash and sells it to the
customer on a profit. Since the client has no money, he buys
the commodity on deferred payment basis. Thus, the client
got the commodity for which he wanted the finance and the
Islamic bank made some profit on the amount it had spent in
acquiring the commodity.
There
are a number of requirements f or this transaction to be a
real transaction to meet the Islamic standards of a legal
sale. The whole of Murabaha transaction is to be completed
in two stages. In the first stage, the client requests the
bank to undertake a Murabaha transaction and promises to buy
the commodity specified by him, if the bank acquires the same
commodity. Of course, the promise is not a legal binding.
The client may go back on his promise and the bank risks the
loss of the amount it has spent. In the second stage, the
client purchases the good acquired by the bank on a deferred
payments basis and agrees to a payment schedule. Another important
requirement of Murabaha sale is that two sale contracts, one
through which the bank acquires the commodity and the other
through which it sells it to the client should be separate
and real transactions.
The
Murabaha form of financing is being widely used by the Islamic
banks to satisfy various kinds of financing requirements.
It is used to provide finance in various and diverse sectors
e. g. in consumer finance for purchase of consumer durable
such as cars and household appliances, in real estate to provide
housing finance, in the production sector to finance the purchase
of machinery, equipment and raw material etc. However, probably
the most common and the most popular application of Murabaha
is in financing the short-term trade for which it is eminently
suitable. Murabaha contracts are also used to issue letters
of credit and to provide financing to import trade.
5. Murabaha:
(Cost-plus
financing) This is a contract sale between the bank
and its client for the sale of goods at a price which includes
a profit margin agreed by both parties. As a financing technique,
it involves the purchase of goods by the bank as requested
by its client. The goods are sold to the client with a mark-up.
Repayment, usually in instalments is specified in the contract.
|
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- I have observed that certain banks operating in Saudi Arabia
have incorporated clauses in their Murabaha agreement that
"In the event of default of payment, the customer will
be black-listed and his name circulated to all other banks
operating in Saudi Arabia. In accordance with the blacklisting
rules the names will appear in the blacklist for a certain
period of time even if the customer arranges settlement at
a later date".
I
feel that this will impose an unnecessary burden on the customers
even though they agree to the inclusion of the clause in the
Murabaha Agreement at the time of the execution. It is said
the terms and conditions should be just and fair relating
to transaction under the Shariah. I would like to know whether
such conditions imposed in Murabaha Agreement is permissible
under the Shariah.
M.M.U
Saudi Arabia |
|
A
- The problem of default in Islamic banks has become very
serious. In the interest-based loan system if the debtor defaults
the interest keeps on increasing automatically which serves
as a deterrent against default. But in the case of Islamic
bank no extra charge can be imposed after the due date. It
is, therefore, suggested by some circles that the defaulters
should be blacklisted so that the apprehension of being blacklisted
may serve as a deterrent against wilful default. This is an
arrangement made on the basis of expedience which is not impermissible
in Shariah. Even if this arrangement is not expressly mentioned
in the agreement of Murabahah the government may act according
to it. However, this should be done only in cases of wilful
defaults, but if the debtor has faced a genuine hardship because
of which he could not pay on time he must be given respite
as expressly mentioned by the Holy Quran. Moreover, this penalization
should not be exercised in cases where the debtor has paid
shortly after the due date. It is therefore advisable that
blacklisting is resorted to after a considerable time subsequent
to the due date so that it may be ascertained whether the
default was wilful and without a genuine reason. |
|
|
|
Q
- What is the Shariah ruling with regards to the purchase
of a certain service and then its resale to a client? For
example, if the bank were to pay a contractor to finish a
building, and then sell the service to its client by means
of murabaha payable in installments?
A.M.A
Kuwait |
A
- The sale of services by means of murabahah as envisioned in
the question is not lawful. Rather, what is lawful is for the
bank to complete the transaction as a contractor itself, or
by entering into a contract of manufacture (istisna) |
|
|
|
Q
- May the bank enter into a murabahah transaction with a client
who wishes to order the purchase of music cassettes, such
as those used by children in their play?
R.A
UK |
A
- Aside from the differing opinions on the question of the status
of music in Islam, the Board's opinion is that bank should not
engage in such transactions in accordance with the legal principle
that legitimate means may be obstructed if it is feared that
they may lead to illegitimate ends. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- What is the Shari'ah viewpoint concerning the purchase of
tickets for travel and their resale, on a murabahah basis,
to clients, by means of a special arrangement between the
bank and the national (or any other) airline?
R.M
Malaysia |
A
- It is lawful for the bank to purchase tickets from an airline,
and then to sell them on the basis of murabahah to its clients,
provided that the agreement between the bank and the airline,
and the details of how the transaction is to be carried out,
are scrutinized beforehand by the Fatwa Council of the bank
before the plan is implemented. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- What is the Shariah ruling in regard to the opening of a
letter of credit for the import of cigarettes, or for its
financing their purchase and sale through murabahah?
K.D
Malaysia |
A
- In view of the differences of opinion in regard to the ruling
on smoking, and its prohibition, we will advise the bank to
refrain from all such equivocal transactions. The Prophet, upon
him be peace, said, "The lawful is self-evident, and the
unlawful is self-evident; but between the two lie matters of
ambiguity not readily understood by many people. Thus, those
who avoid such matters will preserve their religion and reputations.
But those who become involved with the ambiguous will (eventually)
become involved with the unlawful." It should therefore
be clear that the bank should have nothing to do with the likes
of these dubious ventures. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- Is it lawful for the Islamic bank to invest surplus funds
in operations with other banks (sometimes called investment
accounts for banking operations) as a part of an initial agreement
over the expected profits, as determined by the market prices
and the profit margin agreed upon for murabahah sales, with
the understanding that the deal will be completed when the
portfolio is finally evaluated.
A.M
Bahrain |
A.
If the intent of the question is that an agreement will be made
over expected profits, i.e., as yet unrealised, and that later
on the matter will be settled on the basis of actual profits
(when the portfolio is evaluated), then this will not be lawful.
This is because jurists have resolved that profits will not
appear until they are ready to be divided after the initial
capital investment is recovered. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- May an Islamic bank finance the purchase of shares of stock
in a land investment company, or any other sort of company
that deals in lawful trade, by means of murabahah?
R.K
Nepal |
|
A - There
seems to be no legal impediment to the bank's purchasing shares
and then selling them to a third party by means of murabahah,
if the company's cash assets are not in excess of its material
value, and on condition that the company's business is in
no way involved in the unlawful, such as usury, or intoxicants,
or pork, or the like. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- Is it lawful for the bank, when it sells equipment to a
company on the basis of murabahah, to add the costs of installation
to the selling price?
H.I
Saudi Arabia
|
|
A - It
is lawful for the bank to conclude such a deal, provided that
the price mentioned in the contract is clearly described as
the price of the equipment plus the costs of installation.
|
| Back
to the top |
| Q
- Some people have raised questions concerning the lawfulness
of murabahah sales on credit for a term because these involve
issues that resemble interest. They further question the lawfulness
of a credit sale to the buyer, on the basis of the following:
a)
Such a transaction implies the sale of something that is not
in the possession of the seller;
b)
There is a delay in exchange;
c)
The transaction involves sales of like for like, dollar for
dollar, when the actual
sale
is delayed; i.e., there is a mutual exchange of identical
currencies;
d)
According to the Maliki school, it is unlawful to stipulate
the fulfilment of a promise in a contract of sale;
e)
Such a sale involves a degree of exaggeration, which is unlawful.
M.O.
UAE |
|
A - Murabahah
sales are well known in the Shariah and are lawful by consensus,
whether they are conducted for cash or credit. Moreover, the
misgiving that murabahah involves interest, as a sale on credit,
is without basis, and the same is true of misgivings concerning
credit sales on terms.
The Committee
affirms the resolution of the Second Conference on Islamic
Banking held in Kuwait in regard to the murabahah sales and
reservations about compulsion. The text of the resolution
follows:
"The
conference resolves that a mutually agreed upon promise to
transact a murabahah sale to a buyer, following purchase and
possession of goods (by a bank) for a specified amount of
profit in accordance with a prior agreement is lawful, on
condition that the bank will be responsible for loss or damage
before delivery, and what accrues from the return of the merchandise
if a return becomes necessary.
The promise
and its binding nature (to both the buyer and the bank) safeguard
the transaction and brings it stability, and therefore serves
the interests of both. Thus, it is lawful for the Bank to
insist on such a promise, and every bank has the right to
follow the advice of its own Shariah board or supervisory
body.
In response
to those who harbour doubts concerning the validity of murabahah
sales to buyers, we will point out the following:
1. This
agreement does not involve or imply a sale of something that
one does not possess, because the agreement made with the
buyer is concluded after actual possession. In addition, there
is no agreement on the sale of what is not possessed.
2. Ownership
of the commodity takes place immediately upon either a cash
or credit payment. Thus, there is no question of a delay of
exchange between the parties.
3. A usurious
transaction of exchange in a loan on interest takes place
when like commodities are exchanged. A lender, for example,
will loan a hundred dollars for a certain period of time and
will receive in exchange a hundred and ten dollars. In a murabahah
sale on credit, however, the exchange is between unlike commodities,
like goods and cash. Therefore, how can a murabahah sale be
compared to a usurious transaction? It should further be noted
that in a murabahah sale, even though the profit is fixed,
the seller may still suffer a loss if market prices rise;
and if market prices go down, the buyer may suffer a loss.
All of this is a function of supply and demand in regard to
the commodity, rather than the supply of and demand on cash.
4. The
stipulation prohibited by the Maliki school hinges on two
points, and neither are present in the murabahah sale described
here:
(i) The
person who provides the commodity must be an owner of the
capital sum;
(ii) The
person requiring the commodity must intend to benefit from
its price rather than from the commodity itself. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- This question relates to a murabahah transaction, where
the bank opens a letter of credit in favour of the exporter
but before shipment of the goods and payment. And the exporter
accepts the bank's offer, i.e indicating its (exporters) agreement
to the bank's opening a letter of credit and of the conditions
(if any) accompanying it. May such a letter of agreement be
considered acceptance (qubul) on the part of the exporter?
Such that the transaction is complete? And, if this is indeed
the case, then will it be lawful for the bank to dispose of
the commodity as it wishes, by selling it, for example, to
a purchase pledger, and then sending it to him/her in his/her
name directly? Or must the bank take possession of the commodity
and then deliver it to the purchase pledger?
Y.I
Sudan |
|
A - It
is not recommended that the bank take part in transactions
in which the bank does not have a major role to play. Rather,
in order to avoid any detriment to itself, and in order to
avoid giving the impression that the bank's only role is as
a bank roller, the bank should work through an agent in matters
of buying and selling. The written agreement on (he part of
the exporter to the offer and terms of the bank may be considered
express acceptance (qubul). Then when both the offer and acceptance
lake place, the transaction will be complete. The bank has
no right to sell the commodity to the purchase pledger or
anyone else before it receives payment from him/her or his/her
agent. The commodity may not be shipped to the purchase pledger
or to any other before (he bank enters into a contractual
agreement with them. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- What is the Shariah ruling with regards to a bank seeking
Kafalah (surety) from a purchase orderer in murabahah sales,
guaranteeing the safe arrival of goods in working and acceptable
condition?
Z.H
UK |
|
A - Kafalah
(surety) is lawful from a Shariah perspective because it is
a voluntary sort of contract, and may be entered into before
any right is established. In this case, the surety given will
be as a guarantee against loss. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- Is it lawful for the bank to purchase goods from a seller,
a third party for the purpose of selling those goods to the
bank's client, the second party, by means of murabahah, and
then have the bank authorise the second party to take delivery
of the goods from the third party directly?
A.Z
U.K |
|
A - It
is lawful for the bank to purchase goods from a third party
in order to resell the same lo its client by means of a muabahah
sale. After the goods have been sold lo the client, the second
party, the bank may authorise its client to take delivery
of the goods from the third party, but only after the goods
have been sold to the bank and the hank has taken legal possession
of them such that the goods have become the bank's responsibility.
If however such legal possession has not taken place, and
the bank has not become liable for the goods, it will not
be lawful. This is because the Prophet of Allah, upon him
be peace, prohibited one from prohibiting from that for which
one is not liable. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- What is the Shariah ruling in regard to the Murabaha project
for gold mining?
U.M
Kuwait |
|
A - This
project is unacceptable because it includes the sale of gold
on credit, and in addition does not specify a dale of delivery.
Under the circumstances, other alternatives should be studied
by the bank; including the establishment of a joint stock
company with shares representing material assets, thereby
allowing shareholders to earn profits from the mining of gold. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- Charitable organisations generally present charitable projects
to those desirous of assisting them and of establishing charitable
trusts for Muslims. Examples of such projects are the digging
of wells in African villages, or building mosques, or the
printing and free distribution of books or the Qur'an, and
the like. Is it lawful for a company to purchase these charitable
services, and then sell them, through Murabahah sales, to
persons who want to buy them, the main aim being to make a
profit?
A.B
Bahrain |
|
A - What
may lawfully be possessed may lawfully be bought or sold;
as the possessions of an individual or a group of individuals
may be disposed of by the owner or owners as he or they please;
like the digging of a well, and the like. Moreover, what may
not lawfully be possessed may not lawfully be bought or sold,
like a mosque, or land bequeathed as a religious endowment,
or a similarly bequeathed well, or anything else that may
not be bought or sold. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- What is the Shari'ah ruling in regard to tawarruq? What
is our responsibility in regard to a person who deals with
the Finance House in short term credit and murabahah sales
in the trade in which he normally deals, like furniture. This
patron came to the Finance House and evinced his desire to
make a murabahah purchase of a quantity of cement owing to
the rapidity with which it can be resold, as he desired to
sell it (quickly) and then make use of the cash for his other
mercantile needs.
U.M
Dubai |
|
A - In the terminology of fiqh, tawarruq is a stratagem for
generating cash, when goods are purchased on a deferred payment,
and then sold for less than the agreed price. Thus, the buyer
goes into the deal knowing that he will lose, but accounting
the cash worth the loss. Among the classical schools of fiqh,
the only one to approve of such a transaction was the Hanbali
school. There is no legal bar to this form of sale, though
certain scholars have disliked it, particularly if someone
habituates this sort of transaction. |
| Back
to the top |
| Q
- What would be the ruling where a bank was offered a deal to
purchase a brick factory, including what was owed to the factory
and what it owed. The purpose of this procedure was that the
Bank would later sell the factory in a Murabahah sale.
All
the conditions in the transaction that were required to protect
our rights were fulfilled.But the one difficulty that remained
in the process was that the factory was being held as security
for a debt, and that it would remain as such until the bank
took possession of it. What would be the Shariah boards decision
in this case?
M.N
Kuwait |
|
A - From
a Shari'ah perspective, you are not permitted to buy other
than what is actually present in the factory. Its financial
responsibilities do not enter into the deal. If the physical
plant, however, is pledged as security, the sale is permitted
and the pledge will continue in the interests of the pledgee. |
| Back
to the top |
|
Q
- In regard to murabahah sales, documents will be handed over
to the purchaser so as to enable him to take delivery of the
merchandise. At times, there will be demurrage charges on
the merchandise, or a fine that is to be paid to customs owing
to a delay in clearing the merchandise. My question is, who
is to pay the fine? The purchaser, or the Finance House?
U.B
Bahrain |
A
- If the fine was brought about owing to a shortcoming on the
part of the seller, the Finance House, then it will be responsible
for paying the demurrage. If it was brought about by the buyer,
however, he will be responsible. |
| Back
to the top |
|
|

|