Shariah Requirements
for conventional banks
By Sheikh Nizam Yaquby
Shariah
Scholar
Bahrain
Many conventional
banks and financial institutions are increasingly becoming interested
in Islamic finance and investment. How can these conventional banks
and institutions enter this market? Is it possible or not? This
paper is an initial attempt to lay down the conditions necessary
for conventional institutions to comply with and implement when
doing so. The most important of these required conditions are: complete
segregation of funds; the existence of a Sharia supervisory board;
management committed to Islamic financial concepts; safeguarding
Muslim investors' funds from negligence, trespass, and fraud; and
compliance with the standards of the Accounting and Auditing Organization
for
Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI).
Introduction
This write up
is a modest contributory note that sets out the most important conditions
to be fulfilled when conventional banks and financial institutions,
their Articles of Association of which do not comply with the tenets
of Islamic law (the sharia), set up any Islamic bank, window, or
fund. The importance of this issue cannot be overstated, particularly
in view of the wide spread of this trend, over the past few years,
and the oft-repeated claims by many parties that their transactions
and dealings fully comply with the provisions of the sharia when
subjected to scrutiny and examination, this proves otherwise. Little
or no research appears to have been conducted on this matter, and
therefore this note is a beginning toward this end. It is hoped
that specialist research and studies by scholars and academics will
follow.
Forms of
collaboration and their permissibility
Before delving into the details of these requirements, we have to
note that cooperation and overlap between Islamic and conventional
financial institutions in managing investments has taken several
forms. These include the following:
1) An
Islamic financial institution (IFI) offers an investment portfolio,
backed by its sharia expertise, but vests management of this portfolio
in an external investment manager who undertakes to comply with
the IFI's conditions and applies the criteria and standards laid
down by the IFI when managing investment.
This is permissible
under the sharia if the investment manager complies with the Islamic
conditions and his or her success has been proven in more than one
instance.
2) A
conventional financial institution or bank sells and markets an
Islamic product, introduced and planned by an IFI through its sharia
expertise. This is also sanctioned by the sharia if it has been
proved successful in more than one practical example.
3) Alternatively,
a conventional financial institution or bank opens an "Islamic
window" on its premises, introduces an investment product marketed
as "Islamic," such as a fund, or sets up a private Islamic
bank or company. This is the subject of the present discussion.
Some scholars
believe that this is not permissible, because conventional financial
institutions do not comply, in the first place, with the sharia
in terms of their incorporation and statutes. If they do not comply
with Islamic law in their basic charters, how can they claim to
comply with it in their funds, branches, or windows?
In addition,
the funds of these conventional financial institutions are drawn
from prohibited earnings, so how can they invest unlawful funds
in Islamic products? The rationale cited by scholars is that these
financial institutions or banks are only intent on exploiting practicing
Muslim investors and in so doing unfairly compete with Islamic financial
institutions.
On the other
hand, there is a group of contemporary scholars who permit this
type of investment product as long as the sharia conditions laid
down for them are satisfied. They argue that dealing, in compliance
with the teachings of the sharia, in transactions and their Islamically
sound contracts is not confined to a certain group of people. In
this view, it is permissible-indeed incumbent-upon whomever can
conduct dealings in accordance with the provisions of the sharia
to do so. If it is impossible to do so in all contracts, at least
one should start with those that are possible. In response to the
argument that the source of these funds is unlawful earnings, one
may reply that there is nothing to prevent such funds from being
purified, cleansed, and subsequently directed to lawful and permissible
channels. Jurists say that it is permissible to deal with commingled
(mixed) funds-funds that are not purely lawful funds, but rather
are mixed, containing both lawful and unlawful money. This is as
stated by Ibn Taymiyyah, in his Collection of Fatawa, and by other
eminent scholars.
Moreover, the
claim that traditional financial institutions desire to unfairly
compete with Islamic financial institutions can be refuted by saying
that competition is always in favour of the most suitable, efficient,
and fittest. This kind of competition may prompt Islamic financial
institutions to exercise more diligence and care to introduce better
quality products and conduct their activities more efficiently.
This is in fact evident in many nations in which competition exists.
On the other
hand, conventional financial institutions may gradually convert
into full-fledged IFIs if they find this viable and if they have
acquired adequate practical experience and sharia practices in this
field. There are practical examples to substantiate this argument.
Among scholars
and jurists who hold this view are Yusuf AI Qaradawi, Abdul-Sattar
Abu Ghuddah, M. Taqi Usmani, Nazih Hammad, Abdullah Al Muslih, and
Abdullah bin Sulaiman Al Manea. Economists who also espouse this
view include M. Ali Elgari and Monzer Kahf. They all concur that
the required conditions, outlined below, necessitate strict compliance.
Required
conditions
The most important
of these required conditions are: complete segregation of funds;
existence of a sharia supervisory board; management that is committed
to Islamic financial concepts; safeguarding of Muslim investors'
funds from negligence, trespass, and fraud; and compliance with
the standards of the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic
Financial Institutions (AAOIFI).
a) Complete
Segregation of Funds
The funds of
the Islamic investment product and those of the financial institution
in which sharia provisions are not observed must be completely segregated.
The funds of investors who are very diligent and anxious to earn
lawful income should not be commingled with those of conventional
investors who are not observant of the sharia. Therefore, there
should be separate accounts, books, and computer programs evidencing
this complete segregation of funds. This matter is not difficult
or problematic in view of the availability of modern computer systems,
assuming that intentions are sincere and the required expertise
is available. This compliance should be enshrined and expressly
stated in the statutes or the prospectus.
b) Sharia
Supervisory Board
There should
be a sharia supervisory board for any institutional Islamic investment
body, and that Board should consist of trustworthy scholars who
are highly qualified to issue fatawa (religious rulings) on financial
transactions. In addition, they ought to have considerable experience
with knowledge of modern dealings and transactions. The Articles
of Association, prospectuses, or statutes (depending on the type
of activity) should provide for the existence of a sharia board,
whose fatawa and resolutions should be binding upon the financial
institution's management. It should be independent and free to give
opinions on proposed contracts and transactions. The role of the
sharia supervisory board should be concurrent with that of the financial
institution itself in the sense that it should be formed from the
moment the financial institution is incorporated, and that it should
provide continued supervision and permanent checking of contracts,
transactions, and procedures. This should be expressly provided
for in the Articles of Association or the prospectus.
c) Managerial
Commitment
The financial
institution's management, which is undertaking such business activities,
should be fully convinced of the concept and fully committed and
dedicated to it. It should be anxious to implement it and comply
with the teachings governing it. Unless the entire management is
committed and convinced, the business activities and the enterprise
will not be foul free or will not escape irregularities and deviation.
Regardless of how strict and stringent fatawa and contracts are,
this will not ensure sound practices if there is no one sufficiently
sincere and committed to implement the principles. However, there
is no harm in starting first with the executive senior management,
which implement resolutions and subsequently trains the other members
of the administrative team. The general manager himself should act
as a springboard and set a good example for all in this respect.
d) Safeguarding
Muslim Investors' Funds
It is an established
principle in Islamic law that the mudarib does not guarantee the
mudaraba capital for the capital provider. Hence, investment accounts
in Islamic financial institutions are not guaranteed by the mudarib.
However, this does not prevent the laying down of a stipulation
requiring that the parent conventional financial institution (the
original company) guarantee Muslim investors' funds against trespass,
negligence, and fraud. Major financial institutions may sometimes
shirk their responsibility in this connection by claiming that their
Islamic windows, branches, or sections are privately incorporated,
among other reasons and excuses. This is wholly unacceptable. Precautions
should be taken to guard against this, and a similar policy should
be expressly stated in the Articles of Association or the prospectus
of the financial institution.
e) Compliance
with AAOIFI Standards
The Accounting
and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions has
issued and published a number of accounting and auditing standards
that all Islamic financial institutions should comply with and implement.
The AAOIFI's activities are considered a fundamental groundwork
that underpins Islamic banking activities by keeping them away from
individual, personal reasoning. The collective personal reasoning
(ijtihad) of the AAOIFI is highly important in this vital aspect
of Islamic economic life. Therefore, these standards deserve strict
adherence. A number of government authorities and central banks
in certain countries have circulated these standards and obliged
other financial institutions to comply with them. That is why any
party wishing to incorporate or set up an Islamic financial institution
should be required to conform to these standards in order to avoid
confusion, misunderstanding, and ambiguity, and to seek clarity
and sound business activities.
Conclusion
Islamic investment,
with its governing sharia rulings and provisions, is an open area
for all those wishing to give it a try, provided that they approach
it from its front door. They ought to comply with its provisions
and honestly deal with people in their communications and transactions.
For those who are intent on fraud, cheating, and misleading, all
that can be said is that "he who cheats us is not one from
us."
Back
to the top